I must admit that
during my time, I've seen some creative studies. Many of them appear, on the surface, to someone such as myself as pointless. I may not be
a man of science, but I do struggle to see the value in analyzing
toddlers to see if they know the difference between when someone is
behaving like a bully, and when someone is being a leader. What
would you do with such information?
“I think you are
acting like a bully.”
“Nonsense, I'm making difficult decisions associated with being a leader.”
“Nonsense, I'm making difficult decisions associated with being a leader.”
“Let's ask Tommy.”
“Why would we ask
your toddler?”
“He's watched cartoon
characters and knows the difference.'
“Oh.”
Below are excerpts from
the story with my valuable insights in italics.
Researchers from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne analyzed the
eye-gazing behaviors of 21-month-old toddlers — one of the standard
ways to measure expectations in children too young to communicate
their feelings — while watching various cartoon characters. The
so-called “violation-of-expectation” method is based on the
observation that infants stare longer at events that contradict their
expectations.
(Sarcasm Alert)
I suppose we are to
believe that human beings too young to communicate their feelings can
be a wealth of knowledge. Who needs to be able to communicate
feeling when your eye-gazing behaviors can be easily measured to
identify your feelings. This, of course, is based on viewing cartoon
characters. I assume this may involve seeing the politicians
in Washington DC as many adults confuse them as cartoon characters.
A research method has been developed that involves infants staring
longer at events that contradict their expectations. I'm certain
many other things are taken into consideration before determining a
toddler's feelings. They could be toddlers staring who are relieving
themselves in their diapers, being fascinated by a bug on the screen
and more.
The researchers detected a
violation of the children’s expectations when the protagonists in
the cartoon disobeyed an order given by the leader character, but not
when an order given by the bully character was ignored.
Results were consistent in a second experiment where differences in
appearance between the leader and the bully were removed. In a third
leg of the study, researchers tested whether the likability of the
other characters influenced the toddlers by having the leaders leave
I wonder what cartoons
were they using? Was it Sponge Bob Square Pants?, Steven Universe or
maybe Ricky and Morty? I find it interesting these researchers were
able to get cartoons to meet the expectations of children who could
not communicate.
“Do do ma cat, me.”
It's obvious the
toddler is experiencing the intense feelings created by the
protagonist disobeying an order.”
“Wah, waaaaaahh,
ahhhh.”
“The toddlers didn't
like the appearance between the bully and leader being taken away.”
“Ma, ga, cat, go, go,
no, waaah.”
“I can see the
toddler is being influenced by the leader no longer being in the
cartoon.”
All of a sudden all of
the toddlers in the experiment are quiet.
“I suppose their
expectations for cartoons have been met."
“No, their expectations for the need to be changed and fed have been met. I'm glad the aroma coming from their diaper isn't included in determining they're feelings. They would seem to hate everything.
“No, their expectations for the need to be changed and fed have been met. I'm glad the aroma coming from their diaper isn't included in determining they're feelings. They would seem to hate everything.
“I think you're
right..”
“Finally, when the
likable character left, the infants expected the protagonists to
disobey, most likely because the character held no power over them,”
she adds.
The authors say the study
confirms previous research showing that infants can recognize the power
difference between two or more characters.
There have been
previous studies? Other people have been paid to watch toddlers pay
attention when cartoons are played? What a great job. I bet you
could say anything about what the toddlers are doing and nobody could
challenge you.
“Do, me, juice, cat,
num, tree.”
“It is obvious the
toddler feels the torment of the good and kind cartoon character
dealing with the mean bully who is constantly outsmarting him. I can
sense the toddler's struggle.”
“Ga, ja, foo, me,
nana.”
The emotional struggle
within these toddlers has reached a high level. We may have to stop
the cartoons. It could be too much for them.”
“It's amazing how you
know exactly what the toddlers are feeling.”
“What is even more
amazing is how people believe I know exactly what the toddlers are
feeling. I'm a researcher. People seem to believe I know what
toddlers are feeling and the toddlers aren't able to say I'm
wrong.”
“Oh.”
“Oh.”
“Infants understand that
with leaders, you have to obey them even when they are not around;
with bullies, though, you have to obey them only when they are
around.”
This isn't about
leaders and bullies. This is about police and teenagers with their
parents. You have to obey the police even when they're not around.
Teenagers usually only obey their parents when they are around.
Maybe these findings could help with future research when the
toddlers become teenagers.
It's possible my blog
article about it could inspire these researchers to perform other
groundbreaking studies such as how toddlers know the difference between
the food they like and don't like and why they make funny faces right
before they fill their diapers or pass gas. I may not be a man of
science, but I'm always willing to help.
Below is a link to the
article
https://www.studyfinds.org/study-babies-know-difference-between-leaders-bullies/
Don't forget to SUBSCRIBE!
If you think THIS is a
little funny. Check out my book
The Longer You Live The
Older You Get
Or my other one
I Speak Cursive Like a
Baby Boomer
No comments:
Post a Comment