Tuesday, August 16, 2011

COMMUNICATION OVERLOAD

I’ve discovered that our ability to communicate with each other has been greatly enhanced by the development of modern technology.  Today cell phones and their far reaching capabilities are as common as people who breathe oxygen.  Unfortunately we’ve learned too late that simply being able to communicate does not necessarily mean you have something worth communicating. 
            Growing up I can remember how people actually held conversations complete with talking and body language.  You learned to respond to inflections in the voice and how people responded to what you were saying.  Today we can easily communicate without actually speaking to one another.  One of the favorite means to do this is by texting one another.
            I know people who say that texting is quicker than talking.  They may spend vast amounts of time sending and receiving texts on one subject.  I asked one person if he thought this may be his way of actually avoiding simply talking to another person.  He just walked away and sent me a rather rude text.
            I’m constantly amazed by people’s dependence on electronic devices just to exchange a few words with one another.
            I was on a business lunch with a man who spent most of the time talking on his cell phone.  Since he didn’t seem capable of understanding that he was being rather rude I actually called him on his cell phone.

     He asked where I was and when I told him sitting right across the table from him he turned away and attempted a conversation.  I asked why he didn’t just put the cell phone down, turn around and talk to me.  He said he was more comfortable doing it this way.  Luckily nobody in the restaurant noticed the rude gestures I was making to the man sitting across from me.
            Email runs the spectrum of quite useful to absolutely insane.  I don’t forward Emails as requested.  I’ve not gotten rich, become poor or had a loved one meet their ultimate demise because of it.  It seems that people and companies that sent annoying things in the mail now send them to you as Email.  The sheer volume of Emails received at times makes it impossible to respond to everything.  I know some people who do attempt to keep current.
            “You’ve not been away from your computer for days.  You need to stop trying to respond to all of your Emails.”
            “Send me an Email and I’ll think about it.”
            “Huh?”
            Many people are absolutely horrified at the thought of being without their cell phone or not having access to the internet for even the shortest period of time.  It seems they’d rather face anything in the world rather than spend a day without their electronic devices. 

            “During your trip you may have to travel across areas inhabited by hungry lions.”
            “No problem.”
            “You will have to cross water occupied by hippos that may attempt to turn your boat over and kill you”
            “Ah, we’ll be fine.”
            “The land is also inhabited by snakes, spiders and insects that could poison you or squeeze you to death and maybe even give you a deadly disease.”
“No bid deal.”
            “Many of the places along your route will have no cell phone coverage.”
            “Oh no, that’s the most terrifying thing I’ve ever heard.  How could anybody survive such a horrible ordeal?”
            Communication between couples is a difficult and often complicated endeavor.  Getting one to truly understand the other has always been a challenge.  Modern technology has enabled people the ability to connect mentally and emotionally but physically is another matter.
            “My boyfriend is mad at me and we’re not talking.  I wish there was some way I could get him to understand why I’m so upset.”
            “You should go over to his house or have him come to your house and the two of you have a face-to-face chat.”
            “That wouldn’t work.”
            “Why?”
            “I’ve never actually even seen Steve.  He lives in some country somewhere.  It’s too expensive for him to come here or for me to go there.  We’ve just adapted.”
            I may be somewhat old fashioned when it comes to relationships.  I have always felt it was kind of important to be physically near the person you’re involved with for a variety of reasons.  There just seems something lost in kissing a computer screen good night.  Walking had in cell phone along a beach just doesn’t seem all that romantic.  Taking a lap top to a dance club just may just be something that could get you a bit of unwanted attention. 

            It’s always a challenge to communicate exactly what you want to say.  It’s an even bigger challenge to make certain you’ve been understood.  Modern technology has enabled more people to communicate more often.  Unfortunately technology hasn’t given people the ability to say something worth hearing or increased anyone’s ability to correctly understand what’s been said to them.

Monday, August 15, 2011

POLAR BEAR PRETEND PAPER

            Charles Monnett is thought of as a scientist by the federal government and even other scientists.  Unfortunately for Chuck when people think of you as a scientist they also expect you to act like one.  It appears Chuck may have liked people referring to him as a scientist so much that he forgot the part about actually using scientific methods to do research.  I’m sure some people think it’s a minor point but there are those in the scientific community who get a little testy when scientists write papers based on their imagination rather than a study they conducted using scientific methods.  Charles Monnett is now in a little hot water with the federal government for writing a paper using too much imagination and not enough science.
            It all started in 2004.  Chuck and a fellow scientist Jeffrey Gleason were conducting an aerial survey of bowhead whales.

     It was then that Chuck and his fellow scientist observed four polar bears floating in the water after a storm.  In an article that Chuck published in 2006 he and fellow scientist reported that to the best of their knowledge this was the first observations of bears floating dead and they presumed they had drowned by swimming long distances.  Then the article goes on to suggest the bears drowned in rough seas and high winds.  It also suggested that the drowning of the polar bears may increase in the future if the trends of a decrease in pack ice and open water periods continue.  Huh?
            Maybe it’s me but I don’t think flying around looking for whales and seeing four dead polar bears floating in the water means we’re all going to die from global warming.  Was Al Gore on this 2004 flight with Chuck?  (WARNING: The following is sarcasm and not intended to be used for any scientific purpose.)
            Since the only thing Chuck and his friend did was see four polar bears floating in the water I would suggest they probably didn’t know what they saw.  Maybe the bears were playing around to see who could hold their breath the longest under water.  The bears may have died because they had eaten a seal that was a smoker.  How do we know they weren’t part of a polar bear suicide cult and believed they had to kill themselves in order to join the mother ice pack orbiting the planet?  Maybe after Chuck and his friend left the polar bears jumped up out of the water, gave each other claw bump and said “Those scientists probably thought we were dead.  They’re so fun to mess with.”

            Now when Chuck wrote his paper in 2006 about the four dead polar bears and their connection to climate change it was actually peer reviewed.  What this means is that other scientists read Chuck’s work and saw nothing wrong with four polar bears floating in the water making the case for global warming.  Where do they get these guys, Obtuse University?
            It gets even better.  This peer reviewed scientific article was used by people who don’t like the oil companies.  These are people who use products made from oil on a daily basis but need to hate something and the oil companies are an easy target.  Armed with Chuck’s article they were able to convince the Senate committee on Environmental and Public Works to declare the polar bear as an endangered species.  This meant the oil companies now had about 145,000 new regulations to follow in order to explore Alaska for oil and natural gas.  Stuff like this leads to less drilling, less oil production and oil companies donating less to political campaigns. 
            Now Chuck is the focus of a federal investigation for “scientific misconduct” and has been suspended from his job at the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy. 

     If Chuck is being investigated why aren’t the people who reviewed his work also being investigated?  Why aren’t the people on the Senate committee who used his article being investigated?  The federal government is using criminal investigators to do the investigation.  (I’ll admit the following is more sarcasm so no need for the federal government to investigate this.)That makes sense because they need to find out how those four polar bears died.  I wonder if CSI will make a trip to Alaska to investigate the crime scene.  Maybe they could interview a few bowhead whales who were in the area at the time of the polar bears deaths.
            I’m sure this all got started when some big wig Washington DC oil company lobbyist screamed at some elected official that they couldn’t drill in Alaska because two guys saw four polar bears floating in the water.  He probably let the elected official know how stupid it appeared and if he wanted any chance to get election money he better see how stupid it is.  The elected official probably then called the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy and said because of a stupid paper one of their scientists wrote he may not be able to get enough money for reelection and somebody there is responsible.  The top guy at the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy probably felt Chuck wasn’t wealthy and had no strong political connection so he would be perfect to investigate for scientific misconduct.  It’s probably a typical Washington DC play where nobody involved is responsible for anything except the guy whose work they failed to actually read and understand.  It’s a shame that today the only way to survive as a scientist is if you have a complete and total understanding of political science.